4.2 Evolutionary Theories in Psychology

Current theories of evolution portray men as active individuals who forge their way forward through a mix of testosterone-fuelled competition, rivalry, and aggression. But what role is left for women within such evolutionary thinking? The role women get is that of the passive, weak individual left to ride on the coattails of their male suitors; the default, no testosterone sex interested in just selecting the best male to expand the gene pool. Is it any wonder that feminists are dismissive of such evolutionary approaches? That many have sought to ignore the contribution that evolutionary theor That many have sought to ignore the contribution that evolutionary theory can make to our understanding of women? But have women really just been bit-part actors in the whole story of evolution?

Was Darwin Wrong about Dating or Was the New York Times Wrong About Evolutionary Psychology?

While dating and personal ads have been around for decades, the way we meet the people we date has changed dramatically in the last five years. Dating apps such as Tinder have captured a large portion of the online dating market. These apps, but especially Tinder, have transformed the way we represent ourselves online when we date.

Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters: From Dating, Shopping, and Praying to Going to War and Becoming a Billionaire– Two Evolutionary Psychologists.

When it comes to the heated subject of differences between how men and women behave, debate in psychology has centered on mate preferences and general interests. The available research shows that when it comes to heterosexual mating preferences, men are relatively more interested in physical beauty, while women are relatively more interested in earning capacity. As for general interests, men are more interested in physical things, while women are more interested in people.

Even the staunchest evolutionary psychologists would acknowledge these are partially overlapping bell curves: There are plenty of men who are fascinated by other people, and plenty of women looking for physical beauty in a partner above all else. Yet the findings have been met with fierce resistance in some quarters. At the Nature end, on the other hand, are various evolutionary psychology accounts which posit that sex differences in behavior were carved into place by evolution. One of the most noteworthy studies published in support of social roles theory came out in American Psychologist in Alice H.

Elsewhere, though, the differences were robust, both in the ranked- and rated-trait data, even controlling for gender equality. However, the new analyses match up, at least partially, with those of an important article published by Richard Lippa , who asked a similar set of questions pertaining to sex differences in personality and interests. In contrast, gender differences in interests appear to be consistent across cultures and over time, a finding that suggests possible biologic influences.

Buy for others

Either your web browser doesn’t support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page. To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation. Frazzetto G.

If you are looking for practical applications of evolutionary psychology wisdom into human dating and mating, look no further. This book can be a.

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. Now available in paperback? Publishers Weekly. Why are most neurosurgeons male and most kindergarten teachers female?

Why aren? Why do so many male politicians ruin their careers with sex scandals? Why and how do we really fall in love? This engaging book uses the latest research from the field of evolutionary psychology to shed light on why we do the things we do? With a healthy disregard for political correctness, Miller and Kanazawa reexamine the fact that our brains and bodies are hardwired to carry out an evolutionary mission?

Read more Read less.

Best Evolutionary Psychology Books

A sample of research on mate preferences across countries, preference biases in candidate selection, cue visibility and task switching, and persuasion by nonhuman artificial agents. The study findings are published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. Los Angeles Times: Of all of the ways men try to impress the ladies, from big wallets to big muscles, here is one that has finally been quantified by science.

Across two studies, psychological scientists Samantha Joel and Geoff More. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.

The Dating Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Emerging Science of. Human Courtship. Nathan Oesch, Department of Experimental Psychology, University.

Evolutionary mismatch concepts are being fruitfully employed in a number of research domains, including medicine, health, and human cognition and behavior to generate novel hypotheses and better understand existing findings. We contend that research on human mating will benefit from explicitly addressing both the evolutionary mismatch of the people we study and the evolutionary mismatch of people conducting the research.

We identified nine mismatch characteristics important to the study of human mating and reviewed the literature related to each of these characteristics. Many of the people we study are: exposed to social media, in temporary relationships, relocatable, autonomous in their mating decisions, nulliparous, in groups that are socially segmented, in an educational setting, confronted with lots of options, and young. We applied mismatch concepts to each characteristic to illustrate the importance of incorporating mismatch into this research area.

Our aim in this paper is not to identify all potential mismatch effects in mating research, nor to challenge or disqualify existing data. Rather, we demonstrate principled ways of thinking about evolutionary mismatch in order to propel progress in mating research. We show how attending to the potential effects of mismatch can help us refine our theoretical and methodological approaches and deepen our understanding of existing patterns in the empirical record.

We conclude with specific recommendations about how to include consideration of evolutionary mismatch into research on human mating.

The Dating Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Emerging Science of Human Courtship

Picture a woman in her early 20s, with smooth and glowing skin, shiny hair, full lips, and bright eyes. She has a perfect body figure and her voluptuous hips sway gracefully as she walks past by. Why does this type of woman appeal to men? It comes as no surprise, then, if a horde of men is lining up to impress and date the woman described above. Evolutionary psychology is the branch of psychology concerned with explaining human functions and behaviors in terms of how they increase chances of survival and reproduction.

Saini explicitly criticized evolutionary psychology: “in some branches of Inferior has not been reviewed in scientific journals to date, but was.

These are the two comments I get the most at work. By day, I study evolutionary psychology. But by night, I put on a cape and bartend. Probably not and no , respectively. What I do typically study in the actual laboratory is mating strategies from an evolutionary perspective. This is definitely something seen at the bar.

A Type I error occurs when someone reports an effect that is not actually present — a false positive. A simple example would be if a company announced that their new anti-depression medication helps fight depression, when really, it does not.

The dating mind: evolutionary psychology and the emerging science of human courtship.

Author contributions: P. However, reported preferences need not correspond to actual mate choices, which are more relevant from an evolutionary perspective. In a study of 46 adults participating in a speed-dating event, we were largely able to replicate Buston and Emlen’s self-report results in a pre-event questionnaire, but we found that the stated preferences did not predict actual choices made during the speed-dates. Instead, men chose women based on their physical attractiveness, whereas women, who were generally much more discriminating than men, chose men whose overall desirability as a mate matched the women’s self-perceived physical attractiveness.

Unlike the cognitive processes that Buston and Emlen inferred from self-reports, this pattern of results from actual mate choices is very much in line with the evolutionary predictions of parental investment theory. What characteristics are preferable in a human mate?

The dating mind: Evolutionary psychology and the emerging science of human courtship. Article· Literature Review (PDF Available) in.

In evolutionary psychology and behavioral ecology , human mating strategies are a set of behaviors used by individuals to select, attract, and retain mates. Mating strategies overlap with reproductive strategies, which encompass a broader set of behaviors involving the timing of reproduction and the trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring. Relative to those of other animals, human mating strategies are unique in their relationship with cultural variables such as the institution of marriage.

The human desire for companionship is one of the strongest human drives. It is an innate feature of human nature and may be related to the sex drive. The human mating process encompasses the social and cultural processes whereby one person may meet another to assess suitability, the courtship process and the process of forming an interpersonal relationship.

Commonalities, however, can be found between humans and nonhuman animals in mating behavior see animal sexual behavior. Research on human mating strategies is guided by the theory of sexual selection , and in particular, Robert Trivers ‘ concept of parental investment. Trivers posited that differential parental investment between males and females drives the process of sexual selection.

In turn, sexual selection leads to the evolution of sexual dimorphism in mate choice , competitive ability, and courtship displays see also secondary sex characteristics. Minimum parental investment is the least required care needed to reproduce. In humans, females have a higher minimum parental investment. They have to invest in internal fertilization, placentation, and gestation , followed by childbirth and lactation.

The Evolutionary Psychology of Mating and Dating